§PlainStatute

Personal Injury · Dog Bite Liability

Dog Bite Laws in Florida

Whether Florida holds a dog owner automatically liable, follows the one-bite rule, or takes a mixed approach — plus landlord liability and the main defenses.

Reviewed by PlainStatute EditorialLast reviewed July 2026Verified against §767.04
Dog-bite liability · Florida
Strict liability
The owner is liable for a dog bite regardless of the dog’s prior viciousness or the owner’s knowledge, and without the victim proving negligence.
BasisStatute
CoversAny injury
Landlord liable?Rarely
Statute§767.04

How liability works in Florida

What the rule is, and what you must show.

What the victim must show
You were bitten while in a public place or lawfully on private property. Florida also holds owners broadly responsible for damage their dogs do under the companion statute §767.01.

Landlords & defenses

Who else can be liable, and what defeats a claim.

Landlord liability
Generally no — §767.04 targets "owners." A landlord can be reached only through common-law negligence, which requires actual knowledge of the danger and control over the situation.
Main defenses
Comparative negligenceTrespassing"Bad Dog" sign posted

Florida’s unusual "Bad Dog" sign defense: a clearly posted, easily readable sign blocks liability — except when the bitten person is under 6, or the owner was independently negligent.

The full picture, with the source

Every field, and any recent development.

Liability modelStrict liability
BasisStatuteStatute — Fla. Stat. §767.04 (+ §767.01)
What it coversYou were bitten while in a public place or lawfully on private property. Florida also holds owners broadly responsible for damage their dogs do under the companion statute §767.01.
LandlordGenerally no — §767.04 targets "owners." A landlord can be reached only through common-law negligence, which requires actual knowledge of the danger and control over the situation.
Main defensesComparative negligence · Trespassing · "Bad Dog" sign posted

What Florida dog-bite victims get wrong

Florida pairs strict liability with two features you will not see everywhere. First, under §767.04 an owner is liable for a bite even if the dog had never so much as growled — and unlike a bite-only state, Florida’s companion statute §767.01 makes owners broadly answerable for the damage their dogs do. Second, Florida is the rare state with a "Bad Dog" sign defense: a clearly posted, readable sign can defeat a claim, though it will not help against a child under six or where the owner was independently careless. Florida also reduces recovery by the victim’s share of fault under comparative negligence, so provoking or trespassing can shrink a claim rather than erase it.

Common questions

Is Florida a strict-liability dog-bite state?

Yes. Under Fla. Stat. §767.04 the owner is liable for a bite regardless of the dog’s prior behavior or the owner’s knowledge.

Does a "Bad Dog" sign really protect an owner in Florida?

It can. A clearly posted, easily readable "Bad Dog" sign is a statutory defense — but it does not apply if the bitten person is under 6, or if the owner was independently negligent.

Does the victim’s own fault matter in Florida?

Yes. Florida applies comparative negligence, so any recovery is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the bitten person.

Is a landlord liable for a tenant’s dog in Florida?

Generally not under §767.04, which targets owners. A landlord can be liable only through common-law negligence with actual knowledge of the danger and control over the premises.

Primary source
Fla. Stat. §767.04
Florida Statutes (§767.04) · leg.state.fl.us
PlainStatute Editorial
Every figure on this page is checked line-by-line against the current statute. Editorial standards →

Not legal advicePlainStatute provides plain-language summaries of public law for general information only. This is not legal advice. Statutes change; always confirm current requirements with the official source linked above before acting.

Dog-bite liability · other states